hap_teardown() unconditionally releases the paging lock and is always
being called without the lock held: Lock acquire should then be
unconditional too.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
---
While this is only a cosmetic change afaict I would still like to
explore whether to include this in 4.9.

--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/hap/hap.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/hap/hap.c
@@ -576,8 +576,7 @@ void hap_teardown(struct domain *d, bool
     ASSERT(d->is_dying);
     ASSERT(d != current->domain);
 
-    if ( !paging_locked_by_me(d) )
-        paging_lock(d); /* Keep various asserts happy */
+    paging_lock(d); /* Keep various asserts happy */
 
     if ( paging_mode_enabled(d) )
     {



x86/HAP: avoid using bogus/misleading locking

hap_teardown() unconditionally releases the paging lock and is always
being called without the lock held: Lock acquire should then be
unconditional too.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
---
While this is only a cosmetic change afaict I would still like to
explore whether to include this in 4.9.

--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/hap/hap.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/hap/hap.c
@@ -576,8 +576,7 @@ void hap_teardown(struct domain *d, bool
     ASSERT(d->is_dying);
     ASSERT(d != current->domain);
 
-    if ( !paging_locked_by_me(d) )
-        paging_lock(d); /* Keep various asserts happy */
+    paging_lock(d); /* Keep various asserts happy */
 
     if ( paging_mode_enabled(d) )
     {
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to