On 25/05/17 09:01, Hao, Xudong wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Julien Grall [mailto:julien.gr...@arm.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 3:40 PM
To: Hao, Xudong <xudong....@intel.com>; xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: n...@arm.com; Lars Kurth <lars.ku...@citrix.com>; George Dunlap
<george.dun...@citrix.com>; Kang, Luwei <luwei.k...@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Xen 4.9 RC4 test result

Hello Xudong,

On 23/05/2017 03:56, Hao, Xudong wrote:
We performed Xen 4.9 RC4 testing on Intel Xeon Skylake, Broadwell,
Haswell server platforms, verified many functional features on Xen 4.9.
We'd like to share the result out.

Thank you for the testing.




Most of features passed to testing on Xen 4.9 RC4, RAS and nested has
some bugs.



RAS:

1.      xen-mceinj tool testing cause dom0 crash
https://www.mail-archive.com/xen-devel@lists.xen.org/msg108671.html

2.      CPU online/offline fail, Luwei is fixing it:
https://www.mail-archive.com/xen-devel@lists.xen.org/msg108660.html

I would recommend to tag the patch with for-4.9 + CC me if this is a regression
and you would like the patch to be included in the next release.


It's a regression from Xen 4.8 to Xen 4.9. Yes, I'd like the patch be merged in 
next release.
The patch author Luwei already sent out v4, is it fine to reply the patch with 
"[PATCH v4 for-4.9]" ?

I would also mention it in the e-mail explaining why you want it for Xen 4.9.

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to