George Dunlap writes ("Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] qemu-xen-trad: sasl: add SASL
support to VNC"):
> Hmm, I don't think this counts as "small patch with simple changes",
> but I'll let Ian comment.
I'm quite uneasy about this. It seems like the addition of a lot of
code; effectively, a fork of the SASL code from upstream.
Presumably the real end goal here is something to do with security.
But I don't think we would want to offer security support for this new
functionality.
And it might complicate other fixes to qemu-trad, because different
versions of qemu-trad would need different patches (ie, it might
complicate backporting existing securit fixes).
Simon: What is stopping you moving to a modern version of qemu ?
Regards,
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
