On 05/02/2017 07:11 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 02/05/17 17:02, Tim Deegan wrote:
>> At 18:21 +0300 on 02 May (1493749307), Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
>>> hvm_save_cpu_ctxt() returns success without writing any data into
>>> hvm_domain_context_t when all VCPUs are offline. This can then crash
>>> the hypervisor (with FATAL PAGE FAULT) in hvm_save_one() via the
>>> "off < (ctxt.cur - sizeof(*desc))" for() test, where ctxt.cur remains 0,
>>> causing an underflow which leads the hypervisor to go off the end of the
>>> ctxt buffer.
>> [...]
>>> Reported-by: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojoc...@bitdefender.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojoc...@bitdefender.com>
>>> Tested-by: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojoc...@bitdefender.com>
>> I actually preferred the first patch
> 
> As did I.  Seeing as there is no more of my code in it, you should
> probably drop my SoB, but this can be fixed up on commit if there are no
> other issues.

Hah, I've just replied that you should be the author. :)
I am fine with however you prefer this to go.


Thanks,
Razvan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to