>>> On 02.05.17 at 11:58, <bhupinder.tha...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> + case XEN_DOMCTL_vuart_op: >>> + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; >>> + break; >> >> There should be no need for such an addition. > > This check was added to return a failure if user tries to call the > vuart domctl in case of x86 (wrong user configuration). If this check > is not there will it not end up calling the default case: > iommu_do_domctl()?
Yes, it will, like for any other unknown/unsupported domctls. The function is prepared to deal with that. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel