>>> On 02.05.17 at 11:58, <bhupinder.tha...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> +    case XEN_DOMCTL_vuart_op:
>>> +        ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> +        break;
>>
>> There should be no need for such an addition.
> 
> This check was added to return a failure if user tries to call the
> vuart domctl in case of x86 (wrong user configuration). If this check
> is not there will it not end up calling the default case:
> iommu_do_domctl()?

Yes, it will, like for any other unknown/unsupported domctls. The
function is prepared to deal with that.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to