>>> On 18.02.15 at 13:21, <tamas.k.leng...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed Feb 18 2015 10:46:02 AM CET, Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote: > >> > > > On 18.02.15 at 01:11, <tamas.leng...@zentific.com> wrote: >> > diff --git a/xen/common/mem_event.c b/xen/common/vm_event.c >> > similarity index 59% >> > rename from xen/common/mem_event.c >> > rename to xen/common/vm_event.c >> >> Looking at this already quite huge delta I can't really see why >> adjusting white space at once would make it much worse. In any >> case better than leaving white space damage behind. > > I did that in the first version of the patch and the feedback I got was that > it is unreviewable that way.
Not really - in the first version of the patch the old file gets removed as a whole, and the new file added. Same in v2 afaics, where indeed you got such a comment. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
