On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 07:50 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > All, > > I'd like to propose to honor the 'd' in these functions' names (which > I understand to mean "debug") in that such functions should be > no-ops in non-debug builds. I'd then be inclined to introduce a > gprintk() automatically adding XENLOG_GUEST and the printing of > current using the %pv format.
Sounds fine to me. > Quite likely the (mis-)use of these > two functions may then temporarily result in messages not meant > to be debugging ones to become hidden in non-debug builds. If > others agree, I'd try to make one pass through the tree to try to > identify such, Thanks, that would be useful I think. Will you cover arch/arm too? > but I'd like to ask others to also keep an eye on that aspect. I'll certainly try. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
