On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com> wrote: > On 02/17/2015 01:25 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez >> <mcg...@do-not-panic.com> wrote: >>> >>> As it is per our agreed upon changes we can in theory enable a >>> XEN_PVHVM system without XEN_PV or XEN_PVH. If this is indeed >>> desirable this poses an issue at build time >> >> >> And this also raises the question of whether or not we should make >> XEN_PVHVM a user selectable option, right now it is a def_bool and is >> therefore not human selectable. You can implicitly disable it by >> disabling PCI for example though. If we want that to be exposed to the >> user we can then enable some description of what that means, and the >> user will then be able to read / select / enable XEN_PV., XEN_PVHVM, >> XEN_PVH. Right now they'd only be able to select XEN_PV and/or >> XEN_PVH, XEN_PVHVM is implicit. > > > I think making XEN_PVHVM user selectable is okay.
OK I'll enable this then. Luis _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
