>>> On 05.04.17 at 11:22, <yu.c.zh...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On 4/5/2017 5:21 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 05.04.17 at 08:53, <yu.c.zh...@linux.intel.com> wrote: >>> Or with other patches received "Reviewed by", we can just drop the >>> useless code of this patch. >>> Any suggestions? >> Without the libxc wrapper, the new DMOP is effectively dead code >> too. All or nothing, imo. > > Thanks Jan. But I am confused. :( > > Previously I thought the libxc needs to be updated together with > libxendevicemodel. > But from Paul & Wei's reply, and previous commit from Paul, my new > understanding > is that these libxc interfaces are only compatible code for old ones, > and libxendevicemodel > can be triggered, without through libxc interfaces. > > Is my new interpretation wrong? Oops, I'm sorry, I still have to get used to the split. I indeed meant "without the libxendevicemodel wrapper ..." Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
