On 29/03/2017 01:54, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >>> I understand your point of view, and honestly it wouldn't be a problem >>> doing it the way you suggested either. However, I think that going >>> forward it will be less of a maintenance pain to keep ring.h in sync, >>> compared to maintaining a versioned build dependency between Xen and >>> QEMU for the compilation of one PV backend. We do have version checks >>> in QEMU for Xen compatibility, but not for PV backends or the xenpv >>> machine yet. >> For the pvUSB backend I just used a mandatory macro from the header for >> the #ifdef. The backend will signal support when it was defined during >> build and will refuse initialization otherwise. Xen tools are able to >> recoginze qemu support of the backend by looking into Xenstore. > > What do you think of the following:
Let's just copy the header... Paolo _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
