On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:35:22PM +0200, Oleksandr Grytsov wrote: > To summarize: > > There are two ways to rework the patches: > > 1. Keep interface between xl an libxl as is and put duplicated code into > libxl_device_type specific functions. > > 2. Change interface to call libxl_device_type specific functions directly > from xl: > > libxl_device_vtpm *vtpms; > > vtpms = (libxl_device_vtpm*)libxl_device_list_get(LIBXL_DEVTYPE_VTPM, ...); > > ... > > libxl__device_list_free(LIBXL_DEVTYPE_VTPM, vtpms, nr); > > But I need feedback from maintainers. > > Adding maintainers to CC.
I'm leaning towards #1 because we get type-safety that way. Ian? Wei. > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
