Hi Ian,
On 05/02/2015 19:42, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 21:57 +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
I believe that most of the SPCR parsing should be generic, so maybe you
could extend the DEVICE interface to handle the ACPI case.
Extending DT_DEVICE would be confusing IMHO. The answer is probably a
similar but parallel ACPI_DEVICE mechanism, perhaps sharing some
underlying infrastructure with DT_DEVICE.
I was thinking to rename DT_DEVICE into something more meaningful.
Because infine, DT_DEVICE_START/DT_DEVICE_END doesn't do anything DT
specific but defined the a printed name and the device class.
So we can extend the device framework without adding too much new code.
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
