Le 2015-02-04 10:51, "Jan Beulich" <jbeul...@suse.com> a écrit : > > >>> On 04.02.15 at 10:04, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: > > On 03/02/2015 17:14, Daniel Kiper wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:28:49AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>>>>> On 30.01.15 at 18:54, <daniel.ki...@oracle.com> wrote: > >>>> - xen.efi build will not so strongly depend > >>>> on a given GCC and binutils version. > >>> While I can see the possibility of making the binutils version > >>> dependency go away (by manually creating the PE header), I can't > >>> see how you'd overcome the gcc one: The MS calling convention > >>> support is still going to be needed (not having looked at the patches > >> Right, I forgot about that one. > >> > >>> themselves yet, I can't see myself accepting the introduction of > >>> stubs to convert between calling conventions). > > > > How about __attribute__((ms_abi)) ? It would appear to exist for this > > purpose. > > But that's the point: Older compilers don't support it. And with > compilers supporting it we need no stubs. > ms_abi has been around for years. What's your minimum compiler requirement? > Jan >
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
