From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.cse...@gmail.com>
this patch fixes following sparse warning:
xen-acpi-processor.c:505:23: warning: symbol 'xen_acpi_processor_resume_nb' was
not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.cse...@gmail.com>
---
Found this issue on linux-next (gcc version 4.9.2,
sparse version 0.4.5-rc1)and applies on top linux-next.
drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c b/drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c
index 59fc190..6c1f921 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c
@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ static int xen_acpi_processor_resume(struct notifier_block
*nb,
return xen_upload_processor_pm_data();
}
-struct notifier_block xen_acpi_processor_resume_nb = {
+static struct notifier_block xen_acpi_processor_resume_nb = {
.notifier_call = xen_acpi_processor_resume,
};
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
