Euan Harris writes ("Re: Cancelling asynchronous operations in libxl"):
> Sorry, I didn't think you were waiting for a reply. Your explanation
> does answer my questions, thanks.
Oh, good, thanks.
> I think that the current proposed behaviour will suit us fine. We will
> probably treat the OK and NOTIMPLEMENTED cases in the same way, by using
> more drastic means to stop the activity if cancellation is not confirmed
> within a reasonable timeout.
Right. I will rebase my series and get it to compile and do some
smoke tests.
Thanks,
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
