On 29/01/15 11:07, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Julien Grall wrote:
>> The partial device tree may contains phandle. The Device Tree Compiler
>> tends to allocate the phandle from 1.
>>
>> Reserve the ID 65000 for the GIC phandle. I think we can safely assume
>> that the partial device tree will never contain a such ID.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com>
>> Cc: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>
>>
> 
> Shouldn't we at least check that the partial device tree doesn't contain
> a conflicting phandle?

I don't think so. This will unlikely happen, and if it happens the guest
will crash with an obvious error.

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to