Hi Ian On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 17:33 +0200, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote: >> From: Iurii Konovalenko <iurii.konovale...@globallogic.com> >> >> Signed-off-by: Iurii Konovalenko <iurii.konovale...@globallogic.com> >> Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@linaro.org> >> --- >> xen/arch/arm/platforms/Makefile | 1 + >> xen/arch/arm/platforms/shmobile.c | 71 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/platforms/shmobile.c >> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/platforms/Makefile >> b/xen/arch/arm/platforms/Makefile >> index 8f47c16..29e931a 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/platforms/Makefile >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/platforms/Makefile >> @@ -4,5 +4,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_32) += exynos5.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_32) += midway.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_32) += omap5.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_32) += sunxi.o >> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_32) += shmobile.o > > Everything else calls the platform rcar. How does shmobile relate to > that? Unfortunately, the author of this patch in vacation now.
Perhaps Iurii took this name from kernel part (Linux/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/...) where the arch specific things for this platform is located, especially the SMP and timer support. I would rename shmobile to rcar2. > > (I must confess I thought sh-mobile was a process architecture of its > own, not an ARM thing) > > Ian. > -- Oleksandr Tyshchenko | Embedded Dev GlobalLogic www.globallogic.com _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
