On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Andrew Cooper
<andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
> On 18/01/15 15:18, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>> -void hvm_event_cr0(unsigned long value, unsigned long old)
>> -{
>> - vm_event_request_t req = {
>> - .reason = VM_EVENT_REASON_CR0,
>> - .vcpu_id = current->vcpu_id,
>> - .cr_event.new_value = value,
>> - .cr_event.old_value = old
>> - };
>> -
>> - long parameters = current->domain->arch.hvm_domain
>> - .params[HVM_PARAM_MEMORY_EVENT_CR0];
>
> (I realise this is probably not the best patch, but) As we are redoing
> the API with a hope of including PV and ARM guests, can we remove this
> use of hvm params? This would probably involve a new setup hypercall
> subop to set up reporting preferences.
>
> ~Andrew
Ack, that would be certainly a useful addition. We would need to
define some new place to store these preferences for the domain.
Thanks,
Tamas
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
