On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:20:15AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 21.01.15 at 12:19, <chao.p.p...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/platform_hypercall.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/platform_hypercall.c
> > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ long cpu_down_helper(void *data);
> >  long core_parking_helper(void *data);
> >  uint32_t get_cur_idle_nums(void);
> >  
> > -#define RESOURCE_ACCESS_MAX_ENTRIES 2
> > +#define RESOURCE_ACCESS_MAX_ENTRIES 3
> 
> See my comment on an earlier version.
The new added MSR_IA32_TSC and existed MSR_IA32_CMT_CTR should be
read in an atomic unit. How to achieve this if not increase
MAX_ENTRIES?

Chao
> 
> > @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ static bool_t allow_access_msr(unsigned int msr)
> >      /* MSR for CMT, refer to chapter 17.14 of Intel SDM. */
> >      case MSR_IA32_CMT_EVTSEL:
> >      case MSR_IA32_CMT_CTR:
> > +    case MSR_IA32_TSC:
> >          return 1;
> >      }
> >  

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to