> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org
> [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Stefano Stabellini
> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 6:37 PM
> To: Xu, Quan
> Cc: k...@xen.org; ian.campb...@citrix.com; stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com;
> t...@xen.org; ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com; xen-devel@lists.xen.org;
> jbeul...@suse.com; samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org; Daniel De Graaf
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 00/14] Enable vTPM subsystem on TPM 2.0
> 
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2015, Xu, Quan wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Daniel De Graaf [mailto:dgde...@tycho.nsa.gov]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 6:28 AM
> > > To: Xu, Quan; xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> > > Cc: ian.campb...@citrix.com; ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com;
> > > jbeul...@suse.com; k...@xen.org; t...@xen.org;
> > > stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com; samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] Enable vTPM subsystem on TPM 2.0
> > >
> > > On 01/15/2015 04:21 AM, Quan Xu wrote:
> > > > This series of patch enable the virtual Trusted Platform Module
> > > > (vTPM) subsystem for Xen on TPM 2.0.
> > > >
> > > > Noted, functionality for a virtual guest operating system (a DomU)
> > > > is still TPM 1.2. The main modifcation is on vtpmmgr-stubdom. The
> > > > challenge is that TPM 2.0 is not backward compatible with TPM 1.2.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Updates from v3 all look good, all patches in this series:
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Daniel De Graaf <dgde...@tycho.nsa.gov>
> > >
> > > PS: If you need to re-post this in the future, you should add that
> > > line below the signed-off-by on the unchanged patches, so that it is
> > > clear to the other Xen maintainers that only the changed/new patches need
> my review.
> > >
> > > --
> >
> > Many thanks.
> > For example:
> >        Signed-off-by: Quan Xu <quan...@intel.com>
> >        Acked-by: Daniel De Graaf <dgde...@tycho.nsa.gov> Right?
> 
> That is correct.

Stefano, Thanks. 
Now this series of patch were Acked-by Daniel De Graaf <dgde...@tycho.nsa.gov>. 
could you also 
Review them and give me some comments or feedback? Thanks. 

-Quan

> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to