Hi Jan,

On 20/01/15 09:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 13.01.15 at 15:25, <julien.gr...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Currently, when the device is deassigned from a domain, we directly reassign
>> to DOM0.
>>
>> As the device may not have been correctly reset, this may lead to corruption 
>> or
>> expose some part of DOM0 memory. Also, we may have no way to reset some
>> platform devices.
>>
>> If Xen reassigns the device to "nobody", it may receive some global/context
>> fault because the transaction has failed (indeed the context has been
>> marked invalid). Unfortunately there is no simple way to quiesce a buggy
>> hardware. I think we could live with that for a first version of platform
>> device passthrough.
>>
>> DOM0 will have to issue an hypercall to assign the device to itself if it
>> wants to use it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
> 
> Looks like this is because of ...
> 
>>  xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c | 9 +++------
> 
> ... this. Which I think is a mistake, as I wasn't involved in the addition
> of that file. I'd appreciate an update to ./MAINTAINERS adding this
> file to the ARM section.

Ok. I will send a patch to add xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c in
the "ARM section".

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to