>>> On 19.01.15 at 12:33, <t...@xen.org> wrote: > FWIW, I don't like adding hypervisor state (and even more so > hypervisor mechanism like a new hypercall) for things that the > hypervisor doesn't need to know about. Since the e820 is only shared > between the tools and the guest, I'd prefer it to go in either > the hvm_info_table or xenstore.
But we have the guest E820 in the hypervisor already, which we also can't drop (as XENMEM_memory_map is a generally accessible hypercall). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
