On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 00:59 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Martin Lucina, le Thu 11 Dec 2014 13:10:00 +0100, a écrit : > > I've done this in the updated patch, take a look and let me know what you > > think. > > I like that :) > > > From 3880f59159bf0a05b47b6e723091b1e7e4fb6814 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Martin Lucina <mar...@lucina.net> > > Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:33:53 +0100 > > Subject: [PATCH] Mini-OS: netfront: Fix rx ring starvation in network_rx > > > > In network_rx() we must push the same amount of requests back onto the > > ring in the second loop that we consumed in the first loop. Otherwise > > the ring will eventually starve itself of free request slots and no > > packets will be delivered. > > > > Further, we make the HAVE_LIBC codepath clearer to follow by removing > > the "some" variable from the for loop initialisation and conditions. > > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Lucina <mar...@lucina.net> > > Acked-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org>
Applied, thanks. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
