>>> On 09.01.15 at 12:45, <t...@xen.org> wrote:
> At 11:24 +0000 on 09 Jan (1420799087), Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 09.01.15 at 12:18, <t...@xen.org> wrote:
>> >> > +            default:
>> >> > +                xfree(buf);
>> >> > +                ASSERT(!buf);
>> > 
>> > looks dodgy...
>> 
>> In which way? The "default" is supposed to be unreachable, and sits
>> in the else branch to an if(!buf), i.e. in a release build we'll correctly
>> free the buffer, while in a debug build the ASSERT() will trigger.
> 
> Oh I see.  Can you please use ASSERT(0) for that?

I sincerely dislike ASSERT(0), but if that's the only way to get
the patch accepted...

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to