>>> On 17.12.14 at 11:24, <julien.gr...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 17/12/2014 10:11, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 16/12/14 23:37, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Introducing a new bugframe is precicely what I meant by "this doesn't
>> look hard". x86 currently has one more bugframe than arm, being
>> BUGFRAME_run_fn.
>
> And how do you pass the pointer of the function? As I said, ARM lacks of
> %c because of compiler issue.
First of all can you explain what compiler issue there is? Both
{arm,aarch64}_print_operand() handle 'c' (but of course I can't
tell whether correctly).
And then can't you possibly find ways to deal with the # prefix
added when not using 'c'? For the section name (if you need the
section split in the first place) I would think a # should be fine,
and the uses in expressions can surely be worked around by
interposing an assembler macro (even if that macro may end up
looking quite ugly).
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
