On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 12:32 +0000, Wei Liu wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 07:11:52PM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > + logm("Will run the benchmark on host with: $bcpus vcpus and $bmem MB
> > RAM");
> > +
> > + my $kernver= get_runvar('kernel_ver',$r{'kernbuildjob'});
> > + my $kopt= "maxcpus=$bcpus mem=$bmem" . "M";
> > +
> > + if ($ho->{Flags}{'need-uboot-bootscr'}) {
> > + $bl= setupboot_uboot($ho,$kernver,undef,$kopt);
> > + } elsif ($ho->{Suite} =~ m/lenny/) {
> > + $bl= setupboot_grub1($ho,$kernver,undef,$kopt);
> > + } else {
> > + $bl= setupboot_grub2($ho,$kernver,undef,$kopt);
> > + }
> > +
> > + $bootkern= $bl->{PreFinalUpdate}();
> > + $bl->{UpdateConfig}($ho);
> > +
> > + $bootkern= $bl->{GetBootKern}();
> > + logm("$ho->{Name} will reboot on kernel $bootkern with '$kopt' as
> > options");
>
> Can you refactor debian_setup_boot to achieve your goal?
>
This happens in patch 23, at least to some extent. :-)
BTW, that patch came out without a changelog, so sorry again for that.
I can see if I can merge the parts of these patches that play with
debian_setup_boot into something that makes sense for both this and the
other patch's purposes.
Thanks and Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
