On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 22:50 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>
> ---
> ts-xen-install | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/ts-xen-install b/ts-xen-install
> index 4d34d1f..2e2fcbc 100755
> --- a/ts-xen-install
> +++ b/ts-xen-install
> @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ if (@ARGV and $ARGV[0] eq '--check') {
>
> our $ho;
>
> +my $enable_xsm = $r{enable_xsm} =~ m/y/ ? 1 : 0;
> +
> my %distpath;
>
> sub packages () {
> @@ -171,7 +173,7 @@ sub setupboot () {
> }
>
> my $want_kernver = get_runvar('kernel_ver',$r{'kernbuildjob'});
> - debian_boot_setup($ho, $want_kernver, $xenhopt, \%distpath, \@hooks);
> + debian_boot_setup($ho, $want_kernver, $enable_xsm, $xenhopt, \%distpath,
> \@hooks);
Doesn't this have to be in the same patch as the one which adds the new
parameter in the function declaration? Or at least that patch needs to
hardcode a false until now.
(not sure we care much about bisectability in osstest, Ian?)
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
