On 04/12/14 15:36, Anthony Wright wrote: >> On 01/12/14 14:22, David Vrabel wrote: >> This VIF protocol is weird. The first slot contains a txreq with a >> size >> for the total length of the packet, subsequent slots have sizes for >> that >> fragment only. >> >> netback then has to calculate how long the first slot is, by >> subtracting >> all the size from the following slots. >> >> So something has gone wrong but it's not obvious what it is. Any >> chance >> you can dump the ring state when it happens? > > We think we've worked out how to dump the ring state, please see below.
We need the full contents of the ring which isn't currently available via debugfs and I haven't had time to put together a debug patch to make it available. David _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
