>>> On 04.12.14 at 12:07, <david.vra...@citrix.com> wrote: > On 03/12/14 21:40, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> From: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> >> >> When a PF driver unloads, it may find it necessary to leave the VFs >> around simply because of pciback having marked them as assigned to a >> guest. Utilize a suitable notification to let go of the VFs, thus >> allowing the PF to go back into the state it was before its driver >> loaded (which in particular allows the driver to be loaded again with >> it being able to create the VFs anew, but which also allows to then >> pass through the PF instead of the VFs). >> >> Don't do this however for any VFs currently in active use by a guest. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> >> [v2: Removed the switch statement, moved it about] >> [v3: Redid it a bit differently] > > Jan, are you happy with Konrad's change now?
Yes: http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-12/msg00267.html Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
