On 03/12/14 20:38, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 04:04:20PM +0000, David Vrabel wrote: >> The default limit for the number of PIRQs for hardware domains (dom0) >> is not sufficient for some (x86) systems. >> >> Since the pirq structures are individually and dynamically allocated, >> the limit for hardware domains may be increased to the number of >> possible IRQs. > > Why not also expand the number for the guest?
Because the default doesn't need to be increased for domUs at this time and I did not want to audit the code to make sure a guest can't (for example) repeatedly map PIRQs, using up all pirqs/irqs in Xen. David _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel