Hi Ian, On 28/11/14 11:47, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 18:02 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: >> state at the GIC level. This would also avoid masking the output signal >> and requires specific handling in the guest OS. > > "which requires"? > > It doesn't seem quite right to me otherwise, since context switching the > virq state *removes* the need to have the guest do anything other than > what it would do on native.
I though the "avoid" would apply for both "masking" and "requires". > Assuming this is what you meant I propose (fixing some grammar etc as I > go): Thanks for the correction, I will use this version. Shall I put your signed-off-by? Regards, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
