On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 07:54:03AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 21.11.14 at 23:03, <konrad.w...@oracle.com> wrote: > > I rewrote it a bit to be more in the style of pciback: > >[...] > > [v2: Removed the switch statement, moved it about] > > What you don't mention here is that you also removed the outer > loop, yet that breaks functionality afaict: There can (and I suppose > normally will) be multiple VFs needing device_release_driver() called > when a single PF goes away.
Good point. > > Also I'm not really happy for a patch with my S-o-b underneath to > introduce goto-s without real need. Will ditch them. > > Jan > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
