On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 09:18:30PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: > > Thursday, November 20, 2014, 8:51:33 PM, you wrote: > > > Ah crud. > > > So a simple fix could be to seperate the 'state' to only deal with the > > raise_softirq and softirq_dpci. And then add a new (old) 'masked' to > > deal between hvm_dirq_assist, pt_irq_guest_eoi and hvm_do_IRQ_dpci. > > > > From 94a98e20a8ab721a58788919f92e3524a6c6e25c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com> > > Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:28:11 -0500 > > Subject: [PATCH] dpci: Add 'masked' as an gate for hvm_dirq_assist to > > process. > > > commit f6dd295381f4b6a66acddacf46bca8940586c8d8 > > "dpci: replace tasklet with softirq" used the 'masked' as an > > two-bit state mechanism (STATE_SCHED, STATE_RUN) to communicate > > between 'raise_softirq_for' and 'dpci_softirq' to determine whether > > the 'struct hvm_pirq_dpci' can be re-scheduled. > > <SNIP> > > Hi Konrad, > > Is this patch supposed to replace both the previous ones ?
Yes. > > -- > Sander > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
