>>> On 20.11.14 at 12:06, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
> On 20/11/14 10:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c
>> @@ -90,6 +90,15 @@ static bool_t amd_erratum383_found __rea
>> static uint64_t osvw_length, osvw_status;
>> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(osvw_lock);
>>
>> +/* Only crash the guest if the problem originates in kernel mode. */
>> +static void svm_crash_or_gp(struct vcpu *v)
>> +{
>> + if ( vmcb_get_cpl(v->arch.hvm_svm.vmcb) )
>> + hvm_inject_hw_exception(TRAP_invalid_op, HVM_DELIVER_NO_ERROR_CODE);
>
> This (and its VMX counterpart) should either deliver a #GP fault, or
> have its name changed to not imply a #GP fault.
Indeed - not sure how I managed to get this mixed up.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
