On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote:

> >>> On 12.11.14 at 16:48, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > On 12/11/14 15:31, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> >>  xen/include/public/domctl.h         |  44 +--
> >>  xen/include/public/hvm/params.h     |   2 +-
> >>  xen/include/public/mem_event.h      | 134 -------
> >>  xen/include/public/memory.h         |   6 +-
> >>  xen/include/public/vm_event.h       | 179 +++++++++
> >
> > While in principle I think this series is a very good thing, there is a
> > problem with editing the pubic header files.
> >
> > The contents of mem_event.h is not currently hidden behind #ifdef
> > __XEN_TOOLS__
> >
> > As a result, it is strictly speaking part of the VM-visible public
> > API/ABI and not permitted to change in a backwards incompatible manor.
> >
> > Having said that, it is currently only usable by privileged domains, so
> > there is an argument to be made for declaring that it should have been
> > hidden behind __XEN_TOOLS__ in the first place, making it permittable to
> > change.
>
> I'm not sure I agree - the meaning of "tools" here would seem quite a
> bit different than e.g. in domctl.h. Looking at patch 1, I can't see how
> an old consumer (remember that for many of these we have at best
> fake consumers in the tree) would deal with the now differently
> arranged data. I don't see any versioning of the interface, and hence
> I can't see how tools would know which of the formats to expect.
>
> Jan
>

The lack of versioning is a real concern which I have aired during the 4.5
development process. For example, when we switched from HVMEM_access_* to
XENMEM_access_* a customer had to do a bunch of manual configure checks to
determine what is supported and what isn't. Furthermore, many of the
related APIs have changed quite radically between Xen 4.1-4.5, some being
abandoned midway just to resurface later in a different context. Going
forward having a clear VM_EVENT_VERSION definition would be very helpful
and would be the cleanest solution IMHO.

Tamas
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to