>>> On 14.11.14 at 03:21, <tiejun.c...@intel.com> wrote: > Even if eventually we'll reorder that sequence, this just change that > approach to get BDF. Are you fine to this subsequent change?
You again pass a struct domain pointer to the IOMMU-specific function. I already told you not to do so - the domain specific aspect should be taken care of by the callback function, i.e. you need to make SBDF available to it (just like you already properly did in the previous round for BDF). I suppose that'll at once make the ugly open coding of for_each_rmrr_device() unnecessary - you can just use that construct as replacement for what right now is list_for_each_entry(). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
