>>> On 12.11.14 at 11:53, <robert...@intel.com> wrote: >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] >> >>> On 12.11.14 at 07:58, <robert...@intel.com> wrote: >> > 4. Not all PFs are available if assign multi VT-d devices to Wndows guest >> > VM >> > http://bugzilla-archived.xenproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1896 >> >> I think we were told the other day that pass-through of PFs is >> not being supported by Intel. What's the purpose of reporting >> bugs there? > This bug was filed before the certainness about PF issue, so this one still > follow previous perception. I shall have redefined this bug. Sorry for > confusing you. You can ignore this bug itself. > But there is still another issue incurred if we follow the new perception, > i.e. xl tool stack should forbid user to assign PF or if you decide to allow > user doing so, some further supporting work shall be done.
Why would the tool stack want to enforce such an Intel(-only?) policy? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
