On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 15:26 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > That is to guard against somebody building against libxc or libxl and > > then becoming dependent on this and then complaining that it is not in > > Xen 4.6. > > libxc does not have a stable API and libxl doesn't expose this interface > at all. At the hypercall level this is a domctl which simliarly has no > stable interface. > > So I don't think there is any need to wrap anything or guard against > anything.
That's true. A comment in the header file wouldn't hurt though. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
