Hi Francesco, >> It would be better if the configure script would complain about >> mismatched options instead. > this should be already done: try to give --enable-shared --without-wxshared. > > It doesn't complain on the opposite case since it should be allowed to > give --disable-shared --with-wxshared; it's just that the bakefile part > for the SHARED option is missing.
You are right. > I think we discussed something similar (i.e. whether we should use as > option names BUILD/SHARED/UNICODE as win32 wx makefiles do or rather > WX_DEBUG/WX_SHARED/WX_UNICODE option names -- we decided for the > latter)... but I don't think they we decided about coexistence of SHARED > and WX_SHARED... You are right again. The discussion was about introducing WX_ prefixed options and, yes, we didn't decide the latter but the introduction. > actually I tried to implement it and it results easier than I thought. > [...] > I have just committed updated version of wxCode bakefiles both to > CVS and SVN. Great. I'll give it a try within the next few days. > I'd appreciate if other peoples tested the modified build system... I'll do that and let you know the results. Regards, Ulrich ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ wxCode-users mailing list wxCode-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxcode-users
