John Labenski ha scritto:
I think we have to stick with one or the other. If someone uses a few
different components from wxCode they don't want to have to mess with
getting some using CVS and the rest with SVN.
Does using SVN break the cvs browser from the SF project page?
no, it doesn't. It just adds a new link 'Browse SVN'.
Once SVN is enabled, Cvs *can* be disabled but that's not mandatory.
> I think
that's very useful every once in a while.
Just a note, switching to SVN won't fix SF's server problems, I think
it's just bad luck that they seem to always happen to the cvs server.
well, SVN requires lower resources (except for HD space) AFAIK on server
side (since it sends less data on the web)... maybe that SF SVN servers
will be more reliable than CVS ones...
----
I vote no, just because I'm lazy, fear change, and don't want to have
to learn something new. :) [also I'm not convinced that it's really
so much better or that SF supports it as well]
If people want it however, I won't complain, too much, at least.
Ok... I think we are polling here... so let's count how many say yes and
how many say no ;)
Francesco
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
wxCode-users mailing list
wxCode-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxcode-users
