I'm pretty sure, although I can't know for certain, that W1AW/0's WSJT-X auto seq answered me after his CQ when I was calling W1AW/7.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 4:42 PM Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hi Jon, > > I don’t see any hash collision in those messages. You should ask what > W1WW/0 did? Perhaps operator was waiting a “73” from your, but you sent one > to W1WW/3 and W1WW/0 decided to send you a new report. I don’t know whether > that station received your message at 205445 as you changed it to W1WW/7 at > 205448. Could be possible! In any case both station sent to you “RR73”. > 73, Reino OH3mA > > > > *From:* Jon Anhold via wsjt-devel [mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net] > > *Sent:* 20. tammikuutata 2023 22:56 > *To:* WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > *Cc:* Jon Anhold <j...@anhold.com> > *Subject:* [wsjt-devel] Hashed callsign collisions? > > > > I was just on 20m trying to work W1AW/7, and W1AW/0 answered me, twice - > is this a known issue with longer/hashed callsigns? > > > > [image: image.png] > > > > 73 de KM8V Jon > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
