Turn on "Controls" and adjust your "Start" to "Start 100" and your waterfall 
will look better.

Flatten does not like to see the edges of one's bandpass.

Mike W9MDB






On Thursday, June 16, 2022, 09:06:49 PM CDT, Alex Lelievre via wsjt-devel 
<[email protected]> wrote: 





I’ve been testing the 2.6.0-rc1 native Apple Silicon build.  It’s working very 
nicely.
You can grab it here: 
https://www.dropbox.com/s/dj7dx4swnh1pnas/wsjtx.app.zip?dl=0





There is a source code patch I need to apply to avoid a crash but otherwise 
works in FT8 mode perfectly (this is all I really test).  I would love to be 
able to submit this patch as a pull-request.  The patch is in grid2deg.f90.  
I’ve posted the patch to this list previously.  It’s a string length issue with 
the newer and stricter gfortran compiler.

Switching to MSK144 causes a runtime error immediately:
At line 3 of file 
/Users/alex/opensource/wsjtx-build/wsjtx-prefix/src/wsjtx/lib/hspec.f90
Fortran runtime error: Actual string length is shorter than the declared one 
for dummy argument 'line1' (0/80)

I tried to fix this by changing the parameters from 80 to (*).  This didn’t 
really help because the problem is that the line1 variable is zero length so my 
fix only changes the runtime error to a hard crash.  Oops-  but the code does 
get a tiny bit further and I can see the mode change before crashing.

I also have some additional feedback from Clarke K1JX who is testing the native 
build of 2.6.0rc-1:
(For context: 2.6.0 fixes a crash in hamlib on Apple Silicon when using 
Elecraft rigs for CAT, yay!).

Clarke writes:

> It’s been going for about a half hour here, including a lot of transmit.
> 
> So, obviously, the KX3 connects properly.
> 
> For the first time in several versions, the slider controls for the waterfall 
> display and the Pwr work properly.  I’d managed to get the Pwr set right and 
> just left it before, but it was impossible to set the waterfall.  Now, it’s 
> like a miracle just happened.  
> 
> In addition, the slider control displays look right now, too.  In the regular 
> Intel version I tried this afternoon, that wasn’t the case.
> 
> Decodes are almost instant now and much smoother.  I looked down and there 
> was 54 stations decoded in one FT8 period.  Very fast.
> 
> So, overall I’d have to say that you did great!  I’ll keep you apprised of 
> what happens.
> 
> 73,
> 
> Clarke

Thanks to Clarke for testing and thanks to everyone who contributes to WSJT-X!
73,
alex K6LOT

_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to