Hi, that's a good idea but I see some problems.
1) you have not checked where this value is used and what is the meaning of -1, thus you have broken the feature. (This is the biggest problem from my point of view) 2) I see from /usr/src/limits.h : "ISO C99 Standard: 7.10/5.2.4.2.1 Sizes of integer types <limits.h>". It means that your code is conforming to C99 standard which not part of C++ ones (C++ has diverged from C before). Thus, it is not portable (same issue that NAN - bug #11713 - https://gna.org/bugs/?11713) Instead, we can probably use std::numeric_limits< unsigned int >::max() (see http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/latest-doxygen/a01233.html) Regards, Matthieu Yoann a écrit : > Author: plorf > Date: Wed May 28 21:42:27 2008 > New Revision: 4542 > > URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/wormux?rev=4542&view=rev > Log: > particles : correct a compilation error : assign -1 to an unsigned int, i > have add <limit> and use the library max unsigned int instead. It should be > exactly the same values, but better i hope > > Modified: > trunk/src/particles/polecat_fart.cpp > > > _______________________________________________ > Wormux-cvs mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wormux-cvs > > > _______________________________________________ Wormux-dev mailing list Wormux-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wormux-dev
