On 09/01/07, olivier boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Komuro Masami wrote:
Who said that?
> > Je suis en train de travailler sur les musiques des niveaux "Halloween" > et "Hell". Je pense pouvoir envoyer celle pour "hell" demain et "halloween" > le week end prochain. > > > > I'm working on musics for "Hell" & "Halloween" levels. I think I can > send "hell"'s music tomorrow and "halloween"'s music on next saturday. > > I expect the music to be under the same license as the rest of the game > content, meaning GNU GPL. It > would be a shame to have only one release of Debian with Wormux. > Creative common should be better for music content. An old tchat spoke about that.
No: 1. Creative commons is non-free[1] and that would mean we would have to place wormux outside the main section of the Debian distribution. 2. There are better alternatives to Creative-Commons[2] [1] http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html [2] <quote> debian-legal contributors recommend that authors who wish to create works compatible with the Debian Free Software Guidelines should not use any of the licenses in the Creative Commons license suite. Authors who use or are planning to use a Creative Commons license that includes the NonCommercial or NoDerivs license elements should understand that these restrictions are incompatible with Free Software. Authors who use or are planning to use the Attribution 2.0 license should consider a similar Free Software license such as a BSD- or MIT-style license [BSD], [MIT]. Authors who use or are planning to use the Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license should consider a similar Free Software license such as the GNU General Public License [GPL]. </quote> -- Regards, EddyP ============================================= "Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein _______________________________________________ Wormux-dev mailing list Wormux-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wormux-dev
