Seems reasonable. On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:57 AM, vchauras <vivekchauras...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Yes, I want a single unified installation. The flow of UI would be > something > like: > > 1- Welcome > 2- Ask for user inputs (checkbox, filling some values) > 3- The user inputs can now be passed to m1 and m2 if they need that > specific > info > 4- m1 runs with its input > 5- m2 runs with its input > 6- finish > > I wrote steps 4 ,5 individual because I think then I can reuse most the old > msi code , okay ? > > I guess the main challenge for me it to create a unified UI for the both > msi > (newbie). Once I have the individual params for the individual msi, I can > run msiexec one after the other. > > How does this approach sounds ? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://windows-installer-xml-wix-toolset.687559.n2.nabble.com/Using-Burn-to-club-2-msi-s-initial-doubts-tp7580493p7580544.html > Sent from the wix-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Got visibility? > Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like. > Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y? > http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html > _______________________________________________ > WiX-users mailing list > WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users > -- virtually, Rob Mensching http://RobMensching.com LLC ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got visibility? Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like. Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ WiX-users mailing list WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users
