Sounds like we should scan patches for those that disallow removal and mark them permanent.
The InstallCondition behavior is expected. If the InstallCondition is false that means "this Package should not be Installed" (aka: should not exist on the box). On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Bob Arnson <b...@joyofsetup.com> wrote: > On 25-Apr-12 10:06, Pally Sandher wrote: > > Why is it attempting to uninstall the patch when the condition is false& > the patch has AllowRemoval="no"? > Because Burn always attempts to uninstall a package that's present when > its install condition is false, and Burn doesn't know the patch is > permanent. You can file a feature request to change either of those > facts or consider using patch applicability instead of install > conditions to control the patch installation. > > -- > sig://boB > http://joyofsetup.com/ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > WiX-users mailing list > WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users > -- virtually, Rob Mensching - http://RobMensching.com LLC ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ WiX-users mailing list WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users
