Johan Appelgren wrote: > On 1/8/07, André Pönitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Johan Appelgren wrote: > > > So the answer to the initial question is that windows installer is > > > broken, and I should just ignore the ICE57 error? > > > > I think 'yes, and not necessarily'. Have a look at hack I just > > posted in the 'Solution for StartMenuFolder < x < StartupFolder ?' > > thread today. > > Okey, but wouldn't it work better if you use HKMU and ignore the ICE57 > error for the registry value that is key path for the component that > contains the unadvertised shortcut?
One is not allowed to ignore ICE57 errors for Windows Vista logo certification (even if everybody agrees that the errors themselves are bogus and should be ignored ...) > I can't figure out what issues I might run into that the ICE57 > error is there to help me avoid. Me neither, at least not in this particular incarnation. <rant>But there seems to be a requirement that any non-empty set of requirements sufficiently close to the topic of Windows installations must contain at least one completely braindead rule.</rant> > I need to support both per-user and per-machine installs. For me pre-machine would alreeady be sufficient, but even that seems not be possible. Andre' ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ WiX-users mailing list WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users
