On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Muhammad Bashir Al-Noimi <mbno...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Pau Garcia i Quiles <pgqui...@elpauer.org
> > wrote:
>
>> One of this days I will put together a final "pack" step in that and try
>> to convince Emweb to redistribute a ready-to-go binary SDK :-)
>
>
> +10000000000000
>
> I wonder why Emweb distribute Wt in source code only while other toolkits
> available in binaries and source code specially in case complicate building
> procedure (I couldn't build Wt in Windows even for VC++ compiler)!
>
> Let the developer focus on productivity instead of wasting many hours on
> find missing dependencies.
>
> For example: I always use Qt from Qt installer (binaries distro) and
> rarely build Qt from source code just in case I forced to deploy a static
> application.
>
BTW, Do you think it's better to file a feature request for Windows
binaries distribution or this thread quite enough?
--
Best Regards
Muhammad Bashir Al-Noimi
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and
AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights,
analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management.
Visit us today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
witty-interest mailing list
witty-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
