Hi,

The error is just another missing library:

CMake Error at 
/usr/local/share/cmake-3.25/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:230 
(message):
  Could NOT find PCRE2 (missing: PCRE2_LIBRARY PCRE2_INCLUDE_DIR) (found
  version "")

I didn’t want to mention it yet because I haven’t begun my search yet for the 
lib or sources.  Although, I appreciate your concern and inquisitiveness :)

Best regards,

--
Mun

Can you share your error message? Anything like this:
https://ask.wireshark.org/question/29646/cmake-dependency-failed-for-v40-when-trying-to-build-an-rpm-package-from-a-source-tarball/
"but here I'm using CentOS 7.9 after changed the dependencies in CMakeLists."

Not sure what the CMakeList changes were.

On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 6:14 PM Mun Johl via Wireshark-users 
<wireshark-users@wireshark.org<mailto:wireshark-users@wireshark.org>> wrote:
Hi,

Thank you for the link.  I was able to get past the c-ares issue—but 
unfortunately, another CMake Error awaits my attention.

Best regards,

--
Mun

Suggestions for work-arounds:

[Wireshark-dev] CARES to old for CentOS8?
https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/202209/msg00017.html



On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 3:55 PM Mun Johl via Wireshark-users 
<wireshark-users@wireshark.org<mailto:wireshark-users@wireshark.org>> wrote:
Hi,

I am attempting to compile Wireshark v4.0.2 on a RHEL7 server and am running 
into problems.  My current issue is that the c-ares library is not installed on 
the server.  I’ve downloaded the c-ares source code but it seems my compiler is 
too old to be able to compile c-ares.

My questions are as follows: Is the “c-ares” library *required* for the proper 
compilation of Wireshark?  Are there any alternatives to using c-ares that I 
may be able to try?

If c-ares is required, then I will try to install a newer version of the 
compiler from sources--since our repos do not have anything newer.

Thank you and regards,

--
Mun
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list 
<wireshark-users@wireshark.org<mailto:wireshark-users@wireshark.org>>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             
mailto:wireshark-users-requ...@wireshark.org<mailto:wireshark-users-requ...@wireshark.org>?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list 
<wireshark-users@wireshark.org<mailto:wireshark-users@wireshark.org>>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             
mailto:wireshark-users-requ...@wireshark.org<mailto:wireshark-users-requ...@wireshark.org>?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to