Hi Magesh, On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 01:43:48PM +0530, Magesh Dhasayyan wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to get an understanding of the QUIC protocol using wireshark > (and other material from various sources). > > Steps that I followed: > 1. captured (using tshark) QUIC traffic between a local client server > (generated using mozilla/neqo, with SSLKEYLOGFILE env to store traffic > secrets). > 2. set the captured traffic secrets path in wireshark preferences > (Protocols -> TLS [(Pre)-Master-Secret log filename]) > 3. opened the pcap file > > Expected: > 1. decrypted payloads for QUIC handshakes > 2. decrypted payloads for subsequent QUIC packets > > Observed: > 1. [PASS] decrypted payloads for QUIC handshakes > 2. [FAIL] decrypted payloads for subsequent QUIC packets > > Are there any additional steps that I need to follow to decrypt all QUIC > packets? > > screenshot showing the issue: https://ibb.co/ysgN5yW
In your screenshot, the visible frames are: 1. C->S Protected Payload 2. S->C Handshake, PKN:0, CRYPTO 3. C->S Handshake, PKN:0, ACK, CRYPTO 4. S->C Handshake, PKN:1, ACK 5. C->S Protected Payload ... 11. S->C Protected Payload The selected packet (frame 4) shows that draft 24 is in use. I would have expected an Initial Packet message to be present. Perhaps frame 1 has additional data. Do frames 5-11 actually mention that decryption failed? If so, it should describe the reason. If you were expecting HTTP/3, note that it is still work in progress, and not supported in the current Wireshark 3.2 release nor the development version, v3.3.0rc0-225-g76dfe6004b. For better analysis, please attach the original packet capture and the SSLKEYLOGFILE file. For the current state of QUIC support in Wireshark, please refer to https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/wiki/Tools#wireshark and find capture samples at https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13881 For future reference, this is a repost of https://ask.wireshark.org/question/13818/ws-320-quic-handshake-is-decrypted-but-subsequent-packets-are-not/ -- Kind regards, Peter Wu https://lekensteyn.nl ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe